Akerlind, G. (2005). “Academic growth and development – How do university academics experience it?” Higher Education, 50: 1-32.
Akerlind, G. (2008). “An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: an integration of the literature.” Studies in Higher Education, 33(1): 17-31.
Armstrong, S. (2004). “The impact of supervisors’ cognitive styles on the quality of research supervision in management.” British Journal of Education Psychology, 74: 599-616.
Bargar, R. R. and J. K. Duncan (1990). “Creative endeavor in PhD research: Principles, contexts and conceptions.” The Journal of Creative Behavior, 24(1): 59-71.
Bartlett, A. and G. Mercer (2001). Postgraduate research supervision: transforming (r)elations. New York: Peter Lang.
Bergenheim, A. and K. Agren (2004). It is possible to develop supervisors. Quality in postgraduate research, Adelaide.
Bills, D. (2004). “Supervisors’ conceptions of research and the implications for supervisor development.” International Journal of Academic Development, 9(1): 85-97.
Boud, D. and A. Lee (2006). What counts as practice in doctoral education? Quality in postgraduate research, Adelaide.
Boud, D. and M. Tennant (2006). “Putting doctoral education to work: challenges to academic practice.” Higher Education Research and Development, 25(3): 293-306.
Bowen, W. G. and L. N. Rudenstine (1992). In Pursuit of the PhD. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Brew, A. (2001). “Conceptions of research: a phenomenographic study.” Studies in Higher Education, 26(3): 272-285.
Conrad, L. (1994). Developing as Researchers. Griffith University, Brisbane: Griffith Institute for Higher Education.
Deegan, M. J. and M. R. Hill. (1991). “Doctoral dissertations as liminal journeys of the self: betwixt and between in graduate sociology programs.” Teaching Sociology, 19: 322-32.
Delamont S, Atkinson, P. and O. Parry (1998). Supervising the PhD: A guide to success. London: Allen & Unwin.
Delamont S, Parry, O. and P. Atkinson (1998). “Creating a delicate balance: the doctoral supervisor’s dilemmas.” Teaching in Higher Education, 3(2): 157-72.
Egege, S. and J. Tannoch-Bland (2006). Research education development (RED) programs and supervisors: Framing a quality research environment. Quality in postgraduate research, Adelaide.
Elphinstone, L. (1996). Supervising postgraduate students: strategies for departments and supervisors. UltiBASE.
Evans, T. (2004). Risky doctorates: managing doctoral studies in Australia as managing risk. Melbourne: Australian Association for Research in Education.
Frame, I. A. and L. Allen (2002). “A flexible approach to PhD research training.” Quality assurance in education, 12(2): 98-103.
Fraser, R. and A. Matthews (1999). “An evaluation of the desirable characteristics of a supervisor.” Australian Universities Review, 42(1): 5-7.
Gibson, C. and N. Klocker (2004). “Academic publishing as ‘creativity’ industry and recent discourses of ‘creative economies’: some critical reflections.” Area, 36(4): 423-434.
Graham, A. and B. Grant (1997). Managing More Postgraduate Research Students. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff Development.
Grant, B. (2000). Pedagogical issues in research education. Quality in postgraduate research, Adelaide.
Grant, B. and M. Pearson (2007). Approaches to doctoral supervision in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. In C. Denholm and T. Evans (Eds.), Doctorates Downunder. Melbourne: ACER Press.
Green, B. and A. Lee (1998). Theorising postgraduate pedagogy. In A. Lee and B. Green (Eds.), Postgraduate studies postgraduate pedagogy. Sydney: Centre for Language and Literacy, UTS: 129-146.
Gurr, G. M. (2001). “Negotiating the ‘rackety bridge’ – a dynamic model for aligning supervisory style with research student development.” Higher Education Research and Development, 20(1): 81-92.
Hansford, B. and T. Maxwell (1993). “A masters degree program: structural components and examiners comments.” Higher Education Research and Development, 12(2): 171-87.
Hodges, D., J. Malfroy, et al. (2004). Working in the new postgraduate research environment: Supervisory challenges for workplace research (supervisor support and development). Quality in postgraduate research, Adelaide.
Holbrook, A., S. Bourke, et al. (2006). Using research candidate Annual Report data to examine supervision effectiveness. Quality in postgraduate research, Adelaide.
James, R. and G. Baldwin (1999). Eleven Practices of Effective Postgraduate Supervisors. Melbourne: University of Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education and The School of Graduate Studies.
Kiley, M. and G. Mullins (2005). “Supervisors’ conceptions of research: What are they?” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(3): 245-262.
Lee, A. (2007). “Developing effective supervisors: concepts of research supervision.” South African Journal of Higher Education, 4: 680-693.
Lee, A. (2008). “How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision.” Studies in Higher Education, 33(3): 267-281.
Lee, A., C. Dennis, et al. (2007). “Nature’s guide for mentors.” Nature, 447: 791-797.
Lee, A. and B. Green. (1995). “Feature edition: Postgraduate Studies/Postgraduate pedagogy.” Australian Universities Review, 38(2)
Lee, A. and B. Green (2004). Mobilising metaphors: research/supervision/pedagogy. Quality in postgraduate research conference, Adelaide.
Lovitts, B. E. (2005). “Being a good course-taker is not enough: a theoretical perspective on the transition to independent research.” Studies in Higher Education, 30(2): 137-154.
Macauley, P. (2000). Pedagogic continuity in doctoral supervision: passing on, or passing by, of information skills? Quality in postgraduate research, Adelaide.
Manathunga, C. (2005). “The Development of Research Supervision: “Turning the light on a private space”. International Journal for Academic Development, 10(1): 17-30.
Martin, E., N. Drage, et al. (2004). Knowledge creation and research training: Meeting the academic development needs of postgraduate students and their supervisors in small and new universities. Quality in postgraduate research, Adelaide.
McCormack, C. (1994). Constructive and Supportive Postgraduate Supervision: A guide for supervisors. Canberra, ACT: CELTS.
McCormack, C. and B. Pamphilon (2004). “More than a confessional: postmodern groupwork to support postgraduate supervisors’ professional development.” Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 41(1): 23-37.
McWilliam, E. (2002). “Against Professional Development.” Journal of Educational Philosophy and Theory, 34(3): 289-300.
McWilliam, E. (2002). Mentor, manager and mentoree: New academic literacies for research education. Quality in postgraduate research, Adelaide.
McWilliam, E. and P. G. Taylor (2001). Rigorous, rapid and relevant: doctoral training in new times. In B. Green, T. Maxwell and P. Shanahan (Eds.), Doctoral education and professional practice: the next generation? Armidale: Kardoorair Press: 229-245.
Melrose, M. (2002). A university-wide workload policy for postgraduate supervisors. Quality in postgraduate research, Adelaide.
Moses, I. (1985). Supervising Postgraduates. Sydney: HERDSA (Green Guide).
Murphy, N., J. Bain, et al. (2007). “Orientations to research higher degree supervision.” Higher Education, 53: 209-234.
Nightingale, P. (1984). “The education, training and employment of postgraduates.” Research and Development in Higher Education, 7: 209-21.
Orrell, J. and J. Condon (2004). Supervision: Induction to new practice and developing better practice: Are they the same thing? Quality in postgraduate research, Adelaide.
Pearson, M. (1996). “Professionalising PhD education to enhance the quality of the student experience.” Higher Education, 32: 303-20.
Pearson, M. and A. Brew. (2002). “Research Training and supervision development.” Studies in Higher Education, 27(2): 135-150.
Pearson, M. and C. Kayrooz. (2004). “Enabling critical reflection on research supervisory practice.” International Journal of Academic Development, 9(1): 99-116.
Powles, M. (1988). Know Your PhD Students and How to Help Them. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne.
Powles, M. (1989). How’s the Thesis Going? Former Postgraduates’ and their Supervisors’ Views on Lengthy Candidature and Dropout. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne.
Sinclair, M. (2004). The Pedagogy of ‘Good’ PhD Supervision: A National Cross-Disciplinary Investigation of PhD Supervision. Canberra: DEST.
Smith, B. (2001). (Re)framing research degree supervision as pedagogy. In A. Bartlett and G. Mercer (Eds.), Postgraduate research supervision: transforming (r)elations. New York: Peter Lang: 25-42.
Taylor, J. (2002). “Changes in teaching and learning in the period to 2005: the case of postgraduate higher education in the UK.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 24(1): 53-73.
Thorne, L. (2001). Doctoral level learning: customisation for communities of practice. In B. Green, T. Maxwell and P. Shanahan (Eds.), Doctoral education and professional practice: the next generation? Armidale: Kardoorair Press: 205-225.
Vilkinas, T. (2002). “The PhD process: the supervisor as manager.” Education + Training, 44(3): 129-137.
Wikely, F. and Y. Muschamp (2004). “Pedagogical implications of working with doctoral students at a distance.” Distance Education, 25(1): 125-142.
Wisker, G. and N. Sutcliffe (1999). Good Practice in Postgraduate Supervision. Birmingham: SEDA.
Woodward-Kron, R. (2007). “Negotiating meanings and scaffolding learning: writing support for non-English speaking background postgraduate students.” Higher Education Research and Development, 26(3): 253-268.
Woolhouse, J. (2002). “Supervising dissertation projects: Expectations of supervisors and students.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(2): 137-144.
Wright, A., J. Murray, et al. (2007). “A Phenomenographic Study of What It Means to Supervise Doctoral Students.” Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(4): 458-474.
Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1992). Starting Research: Supervision and training. Brisbane, Qld: Tertiary Education Institute.
Zuber-Skerritt, O. and Y. Ryan (1994). Quality in Postgraduate Education. London: Kogan Page.